Emmanuel Sewell v. Kathleen Green, No. 10-6392 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6392 EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KATHLEEN GREEN; MICHAEL KING; BRIAN ROMINES; ZOCK, Sergeant; WESTBROOK, Officer; RAGINS, Officer; GARRISEY, Officer; BARNES, Lieutenant; JOHNSON, Lieutenant; WALTER HOLMES, Captain; UNIDENTIFIED BLACK OFFICER; FIVE UNKNOWN OFFICERS, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-01027-DKC) Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Green, No. 8:08-cv-01027-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2010). We deny Sewell s motion to appoint counsel. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Sewell has filed a document entitled Motion of Issues on Appeal of the Lower Courts [sic] Judgment that appears to be his brief on appeal. We deny the motion. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.