US v. Samuel Crook, No. 10-6375 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6375 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MR-1) Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, 25, 2010). facts and No. dispense 3:04-cr-00058-MR-1 with oral argument (W.D.N.C. because Feb. the We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.