US v. Fausto Cepeda, No. 10-6320 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6320 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FAUSTO CEPEDA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fausto Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant United States Attorney, Appellee. David Thomas Maguire, Richmond, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fausto denying his (2006), which Cepeda motion appeals filed sought a the district pursuant to 18 reduction in court s U.S.C. sentence § 3582(c)(2) based amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. v. 2010). legal before Cepeda, No. 3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1 (E.D. on the We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States order Va. United Feb. 9, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.