Steve Chadwick-El v. Roger Titus, No. 10-6121 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6121 STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge, MD, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-02662-RDB) Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Carl Chadwick-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steve Carl Chadwick-El appeals the district court s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons See Chadwick-El v. Titus, No. stated by the district court. 1:09-cv-02662-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 4, 2009; entered Nov. 5, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.