Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Edward Preston, No. 10-6058 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6058 PAUL SCINTO, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN LEMAY, Defendants Appellees, and E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H) Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W. Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL, LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28 & Dec. 11, 2009). limitations for his We grant Scinto s motion to exceed length informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.