David Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 10-6046 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6046 DAVID L. REYNOLDS, Petitioner Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Respondent Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ) Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David L. Reynolds appeals the district court s order denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). reversible We error. have reviewed Accordingly, the although record we and grant find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). Additionally, we deny as unnecessary Reynolds motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.