US v. Patrice Wilson, No. 10-6004 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. PATRICE BEHANZIN WILSON, a/k/a K-Mel, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (7:96-cr-00034-BR-1) Submitted: July 12, 2010 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. KING, Decided: Circuit Judges, and July 21, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrice Behanzin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patrice Behanzin Wilson appeals the district court s order granting reducing his his 18 sentence U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) from 360 (2006) months to motion 324 and months imprisonment based on a two-level reduction, and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 7:96-cr-00034-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 14, 2009 & entered Oct. 15, 2009; Dec. 9, 2009); see also Dillon v. United States, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2010 WL 2400109 at *8-*9 (June 17, 2010) (No. 09-6338) (clarifying that § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a resentencing, rather permits a sentence reduction within the narrow bounds established by the Commission, and concluding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S 220 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.