Genora Flemmings v. Verizon Wirele, No. 10-1709 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1709 GENORA FLEMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02220-RBH) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Genora Flemmings, Appellant Pro Se. William H. Floyd, NEXSEN PRUET, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. III, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Genora accepting granting the Flemmings recommendation Defendant s complaint for appeals motion of for failure to timely filing the district the magistrate sanctions comply court s with and order judge and dismissing discovery the orders. We affirm. The magistrate judge's of recommendation specific is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties noncompliance. have been warned of the consequences of United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621 (4th Cir. 2007); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Flemmings has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.