Qihui Huang v. Ryan Hick, No. 10-1521 (4th Cir. 2011)

 Annotate this Case

Court Description: <

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1521 QIHUI HUANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GEORGE MCDERMOTT; SHIELD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE, non-profit organization, RIGHTS AND Plaintiffs, v. RYAN L. HICKS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00940-DKC) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011 Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Qihui Huang, Appellant Pro Se. Richard T. Colaresi, KARPINSKI, COLARESI, &amp; KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Qihui Huang appeals the district court s order denying her motion to reconsider the court s order complaint for failure to state a claim. record and find no reversible error. motion styled (D. In Md. Apr. reviewing 12, a her We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 8:09-cv-00940-DCK dismissing Huang v. Hicks, No. 2010). decision We deny granting a Huang s motion to dismiss, appellate court must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, (emphasis in original); her motion to permit Huang following U.S. Ct. of App. 4th Cir, Rule 28(f) for she alleged statement of facts could include exhibit, record, transcript, or appendix references showing the sources of the facts stated, and her motion to supplement record, and accept Huang formerly filed Appendixes and coming exhibits. Huang s We also appendix, grant deny Appellee Huang s Hicks s motion to motion rename to strike the joint appendix as the appendix, grant Hicks s motion to strike Huang s reply briefs, and grant Huang s motion to withdraw and destroy a document dispense that with she oral has attempted argument to because file under seal. the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.