Warren Katz v. Holland and Knight, No. 10-1119 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1119 WARREN KATZ, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; THOMAS M. BROWNELL, Esq.; JOCELYN W. BRITTIN, Esq., Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD) Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Katz, Appellant Pro Se. John Thorpe Richards, Jr., Robert P. Trout, TROUT CACHERIS, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren Katz appeals the district court s dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 8, 2010 & entered Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.