Godefroy Tcheufa v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 10-1032 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1032 GODEFROY YOUSSA TCHEUFA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States of America; JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS); JULIE MAYERS, Assistant Secretary, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); MICHAEL J. PITTS, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal; DIANA PEREZ, Officer in Charge, Willacy Detention Center, Raymondville, Texas; ROBERT MILES, Warden, Willacy Detention Center, Raymondville, Texas, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 29, 2010 Decided: July 16, 2010 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judge Michael was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Godefroy Youssa Tcheufa, Petitioner Pro Se. Brianne Whelan Cohen, Tyrone Sojourner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSICE, Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Godefroy Cameroon, Youssa petitions for Immigration Appeals untimely. We Tcheufa, review (Board) have a an of native order denying reviewed the his and of motion citizen the Board of reopen to administrative of as record and Tcheufa s claims and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief (2010). on Tcheufa s motion. 2009). before 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. legal See See In re: Tcheufa (B.I.A. Dec. 8, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITION DENIED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.