Joshua Shapiro v. Judges of the Virginia Beach D, No. 10-1022 (4th Cir. 2010)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1022 JOSHUA BARRETT SHAPIRO, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JUDGES OF THE VIRGINIA BEACH DISTRICT COURT; CALVIN R. DEPEW, JR., Presiding Judge; ROBERT WINTERS, Substitute Judge, in his official capacity; GENE A. WOOLARD, Chief Judge, in his official capacity; W. EDWARD HUDGINS, JR., Presiding Judge, in his official capacity; PAMELA E. HUTCHENS, Presiding Judge, in her official capacity; CLERKS OF VIRGINIA BEACH GENERAL DISTRICT COURT CIVIL DIVISION; JUDE JACKSON, Assistant to the Judges; SHELBY DUELL, Supervising Clerk; HELEN ATKINSON, Assistant Supervisor; DESMA LANS, Clerk; MARION NICHOLS, Clerk; FREDERICK B. LOWE, Virginia Beach Circuit Court Chief Judge, in his official capacity; MICHAEL ROBUSTO, Substitute Judge, in his official capacity, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00586-MSD-FBS) Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. July 29, 2010 Joshua Barrett Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Joshua Barrett Shapiro appeals the district court s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the See Shapiro v. Judges of the Va. Beach Dist. Court, No. 2:09-cv-00586-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Dec. 24, 2009). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.