US v. Thomas Littlejohn, No. 09-8187 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8187 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. THOMAS FLOYD LITTLEJOHN, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL) Submitted: June 17, 2010 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. KING, Decided: Circuit Judges, and June 24, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court s order denying his motion for a reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). of sentence filed We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d in denying the motion. 197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010). court s order for the Accordingly, we affirm the district reasons stated there. See United States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.