US v. Marlin Rainey, No. 09-8049 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. MARLIN RAINEY, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Robert Eric Friedman, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marlin Rainey appeals the district court s order denying his Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.