US v. Hassaan Rashaad, No. 09-7595 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7595 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. HASSAAN HAAKIM RASHAAD, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00195-LHT-1) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hassaan order denying Haakim his Rashaad motion for appeals a the reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). district of court s sentence filed We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d in denying the motion. 197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010). court s order States v. 2009). legal before for Rashaad, the No. Accordingly, we affirm the district reasons stated there. 3:01-cr-00195-LHT-1 See (W.D.N.C. United Aug. 12, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.