US v. Phillip Henriques, No. 09-7184 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7184 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PHILLIP HENRIQUES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00089-MR-2) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Henriques, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Phillip Henriques appeals the district court s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction ยง 3582(c) (2006) based on Amendment 591. record and find no reversible error. under 18 U.S.C. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Henriques, No. 3:93-cr-00089-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. June 5, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.