US v. Dino Giles, No. 09-7144 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7144 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DINO MARCELLUS GILES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00212-WMN-1) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dino Marcellus Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dino order Marcellus denying his § 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. Giles motion appeals filed the district pursuant to court s 18 U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Giles, No. 1:94-cr- 00212-WMN-1 (D. Md. Aug. 7, 2008); see United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 321 (2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.