US v. Derwin Coles, No. 09-6654 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on August 5, 2011.
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6654 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DERWIN COLES, a/k/a Woods, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:01-cr-00254-3) Submitted: November 23, 2009 Decided: January 14, 2010 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derwin Coles, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derwin order granting reduction of Coles in seeks part to and sentence appeal denying under 18 the in district part his U.S.C. § 3582 court s motion (2006). for In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The 2009. Fed. district court entered its order on March The ten-day appeal period expired on April 2, 2009. R. App. P. 26(a)(2) (providing intermediate 19, See Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are excluded when time period is less than eleven days). The thirty-day excusable neglect period expired on Monday, May 4, 2009. (where filing period ends on See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(3) weekend, relevant period is extended to next business day). A pro se prisoner s notice of appeal is considered filed the mailing to moment the it is court. delivered Houston 2 v. to prison Lack, 487 authorities U.S. 266, for 276 (1988). Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1), timely filing may be shown through a sworn declaration or notarized statement setting forth the date the notice of appeal was deposited in the prison mail and stating that first-class postage had been prepaid. Based upon the unsworn and unnotarized certificate of service, Coles notice of appeal could have been filed as early as March 31, 2009, within the ten-day appeal period. However, he mailed it in an envelope postmarked April 3, 2009, which was outside the ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because it is unclear whether Coles timely filed his notice of appeal or filed it within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Coles timely filed his notice of appeal and, if not, whether Coles has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
