Terence Bryan v. SCDC, No. 09-6538 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6538 TERENCE TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, Plaintiff Appellant, and JOHNNY CALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. SCDC; CAPTAIN THOMAS; SERGEANT GREEN; CORPORAL JEFFERSON; OFFICER MEBRIDE; ASSISTANT WARDEN CARTLEDGE; SERGEANT MCCALL; DONNA MITCHELL, Lee Correctional Institution-IGC; LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS; NURSE MCCASKILL; NURSE OWENS; OFFICER SCOTT; OFFICER ABRAMS; MR. FOWLER, PCI-IGC; MS. ROACH, Law Library; WARDEN STEVENSON; MS. ALLEN, BRCI-IGC; CAPTAIN JONES; NFN STEVENS, BRCI Mailroom; JAMES SIMMONS, III, Chief IGC; MARY COLEMAN, Chief IGC; DAVID TATARSKY, General Counsel, all in their individual capacities, Defendants Appellees, and OFFICER JACKSON; SERGEANT MILES; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER HATCHET; OFFICER WIGTING; MAJOR PRICE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-00021-TLW) Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terence Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Terence Terell Bryan appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bryan v. SCDC, No. 4:07-cv-00021-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.