US v. Dennis Holland, No. 09-6444 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6444 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. DENNIS HOLLAND, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1) Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: December 14, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Holland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis denying Holland s Holland motion appeals to substantial assistance motion. find no reversible error. the compel district the court s Government to order file a We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the United States v. Holland, No. 1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.