Ira Moore v. Mildred Rivera, No. 09-6324 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6324 IRA JEROME MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MILDRED L. RIVERA; JOHN R. OWEN, A.W.; STEVE LABIER, Unit Manager; BRUCE SMITH, Case Manager; CHARLES GRUBBS, Counselor; JULIETTE MOORE, Secretary; COLLETTE NICHOLSON, A.W.P.; MARVIN TUCKER, S.O.I, Unicor; LIZ CARLSON, Unit Manager; ANITA V. CANO, Case Manager; TROY JOHNSON, Lieutenant; JOHN AND JANE DOE, 1 through 100; MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH; DENNIS HINDERSHOT; ESTHER SLATER; OSCAR BROOKS; A. PAUL BROOKS; PAUL GONZALES; A. GALLETTA; STEPHEN BUCKLER; A. WIGGINS; KEITH KNIGHT; THOM COGER, and individually, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:08-cv-02540-RBH-WMC) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. MICHAEL, Decided: Circuit Judges, August 26, 2009 and HAMILTON, Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ira Jerome Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ira Jerome Moore seeks to appeal the district court s orders staying discovery and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and to disqualify the United States Attorney s Office from court representing may the exercise defendants in jurisdiction his only civil over action. final This orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders Moore seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.