Frederick Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 09-6096 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6096 FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; COUNSELOR JACKSON; BRUCE PEARSON; HARLEY LAPPIN; LARRY RANDLE; CONSTANCE REESE; CHAPLAIN HOLSTEN; CHAPLAIN WILLIAMS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON; JERRY BARBER, Correctional Officer; GERALD BRATCHER; MCCUTCHON; SOUTHERLAND; KATHERYN LAWSON, Doctor; CHRISTOPHER CURRY; MILDRED GREER; EDEN WHITE; COUNSELOR GRIFFEN; CAMERON LINDSEY; MARC RENDA; ART ROBERTS; JULIE NICKLIN; WALTER HARRIS; D. GREEN; DENISE BREWER; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; CHAPLAIN ZICKEFOOSE; CHAPLAIN ROBINSON, Respondents Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02117-BO) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.