US v. Okang Rochelle, No. 09-6091 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6091 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-UA-1) Submitted: May 4, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Okang court s order Kareem Rochelle denying seeks Rochelle s to appeal motions the to district dismiss indictment for violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. court may exercise jurisdiction only over final the This orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Rochelle seeks to appeal is neither a final appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before The order order nor an Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.