Dilyara Dosmukhambetova v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 09-2274 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2274 DILYARA DOSMUKHAMBETOVA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 29, 2010 Decided: July 15, 2010 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Counsel, Todd J. Cochran, Office of Immigration UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, Respondent. Tony West, Litigation Litigation, D.C., for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dilyara Russia, Dosmukhambetova, petitions for review of a native an order and of citizen the Board Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. have reviewed the administrative record and of of We Dosmukhambetova s claims and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of her See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). motion. We accordingly deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. the See In re: Dosmukhambetova (B.I.A. Oct. 15, 2009). extent January Dosmukhambetova 23, petition challenges 2009, that for we review note of that she order jurisdiction to review her claims. the has and Board s not thus order filed we a are To of timely without See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405-06 (1995). We accordingly dismiss the petition for review respect in dispense part with with oral argument to those because claims. the facts Finally, and we legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.