Michael Moment v. Martin O'Malley, No. 09-2090 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2090 MICHAEL MOMENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTIN O MALLEY; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER; ISIAH LEGGEIL; ANN HARRINGTON; THOMAS L. CRAVEN; BRIAN G. KIM; JESSICA M. HALL; JOHN M. STAYER; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02209-AW) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Moment appeals the district court s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Moment v. O Malley, No. 8:09-cv-02209-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.