George LaRoque v. Sara Conti, No. 09-1906 (4th Cir. 2009)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1906 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1907 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1908 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. 2 No. 09-1909 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1910 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and 3 MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1914 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty), Trustee, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. 4 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT; 1:09-cv-00082-NCT) Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 5 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, George Paul LaRoque appeals the district court s orders: (1) denying his motions to vacate the bankruptcy court s judgments and (2) granting the Appellee s motion to dismiss. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we deny LaRoque s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT; July 14, 2009). facts and materials legal before LaRoque v. Conti, Nos. 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:09-cv-00082-NCT) 1:08- (M.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.