Russell Bearden v. John Potter, No. 09-1284 (4th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1284 RUSSELL J. BEARDEN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00864-JCC-TCB) Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell J. Bearden, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Russell J. Bearden appeals the district court s order granting the dismissing Appellee s Bearden s motion complaint for summary brought judgment pursuant to and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (2006), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. Va. Feb. Bearden v. Potter, No. 1:08-cv-00864-JCC-TCB 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
