George LaRoque v. Sara Conti, No. 09-1174 (4th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1174 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1175 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1176 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1177 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, 2 and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1186 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1263 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. 3 SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 4 PER CURIAM: George orders Paul dismissing LaRoque appeals his appeals from the the bankruptcy denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. the record and find no reversible error. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 13, 2009). court s court and We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nos. district LaRoque v. Conti, 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:09-00078-NCT (M.D.N.C. We grant LaRoque s motions to consolidate his appeals and deny his motions for transcripts and a certified dispense copy with of oral the record argument at government because the expense. facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 5
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
