US v. James Holmes, No. 08-8505 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8505 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES COURY HOLMES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:00-cr-00107-HMH-1) Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Coury Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Coury Holmes appeals from the district court s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Holmes motion was based on Amendment 709 to the Sentencing Guidelines, see USSG App. C, Supp., Amend. 709 (revising USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2)). Although the district court erroneously construed Holmes motion as one seeking relief under Amendment 706, we find the error harmless because Amendment 709 does not apply retroactively and therefore would not authorize a See USSG § 1B1.10(c); United reduction in Holmes sentence. States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 249 n.2 (4th Cir. 2009) (noting that an amendment to the Guidelines may be applied retroactively only when § 1B1.10(c)). the amendment is expressly Accordingly, we affirm. listed in USSG We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.