US v. Todd Herbert, No. 08-8489 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8489 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TODD ANDREW HERBERT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (5:97-cr-30024-nkm-1) Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd Andrew Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Todd Andrew Herbert appeals the district court order denying his motion § 3582(c)(2) (2006). to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and Herbert s contentions on appeal and find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004). See United States v. Goines, Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Herbert, No. 5:97-cr-30024-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2008). deny Herbert s motion for appointment of counsel. We We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.