Nadeem Shami v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 08-1825 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1825 NADEEM UR RASHID SHAMI, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: April 13, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert A. Remes, CARLINER Petitioner. Gregory G. Carol Federighi, Senior OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION Respondent. & REMES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Litigation Counsel, Jem C. Sponzo, LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nadeem Pakistan, Ur Rashid petitions Immigration for Appeals Shami, review (Board) of a native an order upholding the and of citizen the Board Immigration (IJ) denial of his motion for a continuance. of of Judge s We have reviewed the record pertaining to the denial of Shami s motion and find no abuse of discretion. 441 (4th Cir. 2007) See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, (setting forth standard of review). Further, Shami s claim that the Board and IJ acted contrary to regulation, and his assertion that he was denied due process, are belied by the record and without merit. deny the Board. petition for review for the reasons Accordingly, we stated See In re: Shami (B.I.A. June 30, 2008). by the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.