Kenneth Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc., No. 08-1772 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1772 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO ESZENYI, Defendants Appellees. No. 08-1971 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO ESZENYI, Defendants Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA) Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. October 23, 2009 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Dare, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) complaint and ordering him to pay attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $5,000. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we deny Liggins s motion to compel and we affirm for Liggins v. the reasons William A. stated Hazel, by Inc., the No. district court. See 1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 20, 2008 & entered June 23, 2008; filed Aug. 8, 2008 & entered Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.