Randy Thomas v. R. Fulton, No. 08-1111 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1111 RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-1292 RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-1325 RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00200-GCM) Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 22, 2008 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mark Weston Johnson, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court s orders entered in his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), which (1) granted the motions to dismiss filed by R. Harcourt Fulton and James Hammond (No. 08-1111); (2) denied Thomas motions filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (No. 08-1292); and (3) reimposed a prefiling injunction on remand (No. 08-1325). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Fulton, No. 3:07-cv-00200-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2007; Feb. 4, 2008; Feb. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.