Mullins v. US, No. 07-7361 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7361 RONNIE MULLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RICHARD RAMIREZ; E. MACE; MARK DIB; SALVATORE LANASE; KAREN LAMBRIGHT; JANET BUNTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00105) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; William Eugene Galeota, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronnie Mullins appeals the district court s order adopting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Mullins complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullins v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00105 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 30, 2007). We deny Mullins motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.