Simpson v. Fahey, No. 07-6864 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6864 JOHN D. SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice-Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; CAROL A. SIEVERS, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; HERBERT V. COULTON, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; MICHAEL M. HAWES, Member of the Virginia Parole Board; THURGOOD MARSHALL, Director, Public Safety; ROBERT P. CROUCH, JR., Deputy Secretary of Public Safety; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JAMES O. YOUNT, Probation and Parole Officer; DORIS L. EWING, Senior Manager Court and Legal Services, Virginia Department of Corrections; JIM SISK, Manager, Classification Court and Legal Unit, Virginia Department of Corrections; GARY BASS, Chief of Operations, Classification and Record, Virginia Department of Corrections; WILLIAM P. ROGERS, Regional Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center; TOM NEUMAYER, Assistant Warden of Programs, Powhatan Correctional Center; J. JACOBS, Institutional Counselor, Powhatan Correctional Center, in their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00611-REP) Submitted: January 31, 2008 Decided: February 19, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John D. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: John D. Simpson appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Fahey, No. 3:04-cv-00611-REP (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2006 & entered Mar. 29, 2006; Mar. 27, 2007; Apr. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral contentions argument because the facts and legal are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.