Inko-Tariah v. Lappin, No. 07-6242 (4th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 16, 2007.
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6242 CHARLES A. INKO-TARIAH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner, Defendants Appellees. No. 09-6889 CHARLES A. INKO-TARIAH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00585-H) Submitted: September 8, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles A. Inko-Tariah, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Charles A. Inko-Tariah appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and North Carolina s Protection Act, N.C.G.S. § 168A-1, et seq. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated Lappin, No. entered Apr. 10, dispense by the 5:05-ct-00585-H with 2006; oral (E.D.N.C. argument 30, Persons We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for district Jan. Handicapped court. filed 2007; because Inko-Tariah Apr. Apr. 1, the facts 6, 2006 2009). and v. & We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
