In Re: Earl v., No. 07-6241 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6241 In Re: VINCENT BRADFORD EARL, Petitioner. On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: July 13, 2007 (1:05-cv-00067) Decided: August 1, 2007 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Bradford Earl, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vincent Bradford Earl petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court disposed of the matter in an order docketed on June 20, 2007. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Earl s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Earl s we deny motion compensation and attorney fees. for default and request for We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.