Bowers v. Astrue, No. 07-1546 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed: July 29, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1546 (3:05-cv-03477-JRM) THURMOND B. BOWERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed June 20, 2008, as follows: On the cover sheet, attorney information section -- the name of Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, is added as counsel for Appellee. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1546 THURMOND B. BOWERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. Security, ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-03477-JRM) Submitted: February 12, 2008 Decided: June 20, 2008 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTSON WENDT, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Yvette G. Keesee, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Thomas S. Inman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thurmond B. Bowers appeals the magistrate judge s order upholding the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits.* error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Bowers v. Astrue, No. 3:05-cv-03477-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2007). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.