Cornelius v. Howell, No. 07-1514 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1514 NADINE CORNELIUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAMUEL HOWELL; THE CITY OF COLUMBIA; COUNTY OF RICHLAND; NICOLE ANDERSON; EDWARD ANDERSON; CAMILLE ANDERSON; JOSHUA ANDERSON; FNU LNU; CLEOPHUR MORRIS, Mr. and Mrs. and Daughter; KENNETH LNU; MRS. BARBARA CORNELIUS HICKS; MS. MELVIN CORNELIUS; FNU LNU; CAROLYN HILL, and light skinned boyfriend; CHARLES GEIGER; MRS. SUSAN GEIGER; TYRONE GEIGER; CRICKET GEIGER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03387-MBS) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nadine Cornelius, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nadine dismissing her jurisdiction. error. Cornelius civil appeals action for the district lack of court s subject order matter We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.