Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark, No. 07-1501 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1501 SANJEEV MALHOTRA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00076-LMB) Submitted: October 12, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court s orders denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the district We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm court. Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We deny Appellee s motion for sanctions. We argument dispense with oral because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.