Thomas v. Helms, Mulliss, Wicker, No. 07-1233 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1233 RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELMS, MULLISS, WICKER PLLC; MIDDLEBROOKS; MARK W. JOHNSON, JAMES G. Defendants - Appellees. No. 07-1325 RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELMS, MULLISS, WICKER PLLC; MIDDLEBROOKS; MARK W. JOHNSON, JAMES G. Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00052-W) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas William Ey, Jr., HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court s orders transferring the case to a particular district court judge, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his motions for sanctions and to recuse the district court judge. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Helms, Mullis, Wicker PLLC, No. 3:07-cv-00052-W (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2007; Apr. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.