Malevis De Leon v. Michael Mukasey, No. 07-1080 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1080 MALEVIS E. DE LEON, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-833-382) Submitted: January 11, 2008 Decided: February 14, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay B. Glauner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Malevis E. De Leon, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge s denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in upholding the denial of De Leon s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1)(iv) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 2007). See In re: De Leon, No. A95-833-382 (B.I.A. Jan. 17, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.