Kent v. Maryland Transp Authority, No. 07-1043 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1043 DIANE M. KENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; LIEUTENANT DANA WHITT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02351-CCB) Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 9, 2007 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diane M. Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Gisele Marie Mathews, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Diane M. Kent appeals from the district court s order dismissing her complaint against her former employer and supervisor under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000) ( FMLA ). 12(b)(6) should A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. be granted only if, after accepting all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true, it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of her claim entitling her to relief. Edwards Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4th Cir. 1999). v. City of We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kent v. Maryland Transp. Auth., No. 1:06-cv-02351-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision making process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.