US v. Davis, No. 06-7583 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7583 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANGELO DEMOND DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00030; 3:06-cv-00022-V-1) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angelo Demond Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angelo Demond Davis appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motions for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Davis s motions for reconsideration do not demonstrate that his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) was improperly dismissed. We therefore find motions that the district court's denial of reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. his for Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district court s order on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis, Nos. 3:04-cr-00030, 3:06-cv-00022-V-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.