Flores-Rosales v. GEO Group Inc, No. 06-7214 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7214 RUBEN FLORES-ROSALES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, at Rivers Correctional Institution; J. ALEXANDER, Correctional Counselor at Rivers Correctional Institution, Defendants, and MRS. VANN, Sargeant at Rivers Correctional Institution; MR. WATERFIELD, Sargeant at Rivers Correctional Institution; D. TANN, Correctional Officer at Rivers Correctional Institution; MR. PURNELL, Correctional Officer at Rivers Correctional Institution; RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-ct-000623-H) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ruben Flores-Rosales, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Ruben Flores-Rosales appeals the district court s order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flores-Rosales v. GEO Group, Inc., 5:04-ct-000623-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 22, 2004 & entered Dec. 8, 2004; June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.