Henley v. Barnes, No. 06-6610 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6610 VERNON LAMONT HENLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID BARNES, Doctor, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00663-jlk) Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon Lamont Henley, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Vernon Lamont Henley appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes, No. 7:05-cv-00663-jlk (W.D. Va. Mar. We have 24, Henley v. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.