US v. Randolph, No. 06-6539 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6539 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD RANDOLPH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:03-cv-04159-CMC) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 2, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Edward Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd Hagins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Edward Randolph appeals the district court s order denying his Place Jurisdiction. * error. Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:03-cv-04159-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent Randolph s motion could have been construed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), it would likewise be without merit. See United States v. Morris, 429 F.3d 65 (4th Cir. 2005). - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.