Ratliff v. Rubenstein, No. 06-6181 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6181 CLINTON RATLIFF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Corrections; EVELYN SEIFERT, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility; ROBERT KNIGHT, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (5:05-cv-00052-FPS) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clinton Ratliff, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, Stephanie Ann Jones, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia; Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia; David L. Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Clinton Ratliff appeals the district court s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), 1986 (2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B); 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. the Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of district court. See Ratliff v. Rubenstein, No. 5:05-cv-00052-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral contentions argument because the facts and legal are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.