Wright v. Swing, No. 06-6106 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6106 THOMAS WALTER WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHIEF SWING; K. W. BRADY; SAM POST; R. D. BALL; G. W. HASTINGS; J. BRYANT; CITY OF GREENSBORO, A Municipal Corporation; WALLACE C. HARRELSON, Public Defender for the Eighteenth Judicial District; GREENSBORO POLICE OFFICERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District District of North Carolina, at Durham. District Judge. (1:05-cv-00264-JAB) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Court for the Middle James A. Beaty, Jr., Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Walter Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Polly D. Sizemore, HILL, EVANS, DUNCAN, JORDAN & DAVIS, P.L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Thomas Walter Wright appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 1:05-cv-00264-JAB (M.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2005). We have reviewed Wright v. Swing, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.