Ahmady v. Brincefield, No. 06-1862 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1862 ABDUL S. AHMADY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRINCEFIELD, HARTNETT, TOMPKINS, AND CLARK, P.C., Defendant - Appellee, versus AMINA AHMADY, Plaintiff. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00119-CMH) Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdul S. Ahmady, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, Brincefield, Hartnett & Associates, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Abdul S. Ahmady appeals the district court s orders dismissing Ahmady s complaint and denying Ahmady s Retrying Motion Court Order Misunderstanding, which the district court construed as as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this civil action. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ahmady v. Brincefield, No. 1:06-cv-00119-CMH (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006 and June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.